In
“The Place of
Science in Liberal Education,” Bertrand Russell compares the standing of
science and the liberal arts in education in England in 1903. He challenges the
view that liberal education is more valuable than science education which is
seen as being merely practical. Defining education as, “the formation, by
means of instruction, of certain mental habits and a certain outlook on life and the world,” Russell argues that science creates
habits and outlooks of thought as valuable as those created by liberal
education. Today the tables have turned. Science and technology, STEM, are far
valued about liberal education. However, not for the habits and outlooks of
thought, but for their practicality as measured monetarily. Sorry, Bertrand. Not
only do we find it difficult to learn, we seem to be moving backwards.
No comments:
Post a Comment