Much is made of the irony that in “Phaedrus” Socrates
condemns writing in his writing. He sums up his disdain of writing by comparing
it to painting, that “the creations of the painter have the attitude of life,
and yet if you ask them a question they preserve a solemn silence.” They cannot
defend themselves. (Derrida takes up and reverses this argument in Plato’s Pharmacy.) As dialectic,
however, the Socratic Dialogues are a series of speeches interspersed with
questions that are often challenges to Socrates. The dialogues can be seen as
Plato’s attempt to ask questions, to change the monologue model of oratory to a
dialogic interchange. Successful or not? Benjamin Jowett argues that Socrates’s
interlocutors in the dialogues represent
commonplaces that circulated around Athens at the time. His argument is
entirely speculative. We might ask ourselves whether these challenges to
Socrates have been sifted by Plato to allow Socrates to conveniently dispute
them, or whether they represent real challenges. How we answer that question
tells us whether the dialogues are imitations of discourse or the real things.
No comments:
Post a Comment